The only concern I have about the pg_statistics check is that I can't test it. I would think that Mike has tested it to the extent that it's functional and the syntax is correct, but I haven't been able to test it with real data to make sure nothing goes pear-shaped.
The only concern I have about the pg_statistics check is that I can't test it. I would think that Mike has tested it to the extent that it's functional and the syntax is correct, but I haven't been able to test it with real data to make sure nothing goes pear-shaped.
I have added a signoff to the tip of this branch (cleanly rebased to master): http:// git.evergreen- ils.org/ ?p=working/ Evergreen. git;a=shortlog; h=refs/ heads/user/ jboyer/ lp-1438136- query_int_ wrapper_ signoff but I would feel more comfortable with an additional signoff from someone running 9.2 or newer.