1. For the release notes, where you explain how to form the URL, should we include something that says &format=xxxx should be tacked on to the end of the URL? I can make the changes to the release notes, but I wasn't sure if it really was needed since I'm unclear on whether the format= is necessary. I do see that, if it's missing, the available formats are returned as you described in your above comment.
2. I'm not sure if this is a bug or a problem with my URL. I was trying some of the different class names and encountered problems when I tried cbs. Using this URL:
I get a bib source of Project Gutenberg instead of the correct bib source, oclc. When I use the class in an include, it properly lists the bib source as OCLC. See
Thanks for the new branch Galen! This looks good.
I have a few questions:
1. For the release notes, where you explain how to form the URL, should we include something that says &format=xxxx should be tacked on to the end of the URL? I can make the changes to the release notes, but I wasn't sure if it really was needed since I'm unclear on whether the format= is necessary. I do see that, if it's missing, the available formats are returned as you described in your above comment.
2. I'm not sure if this is a bug or a problem with my URL. I was trying some of the different class names and encountered problems when I tried cbs. Using this URL:
http:// mlnc1.mvlcstaff .org/opac/ extras/ unapi?id= tag::U2@ cbs/3&format= mods32
I get a bib source of Project Gutenberg instead of the correct bib source, oclc. When I use the class in an include, it properly lists the bib source as OCLC. See
http:// mlnc1.mvlcstaff .org/opac/ extras/ unapi?id= tag::U2@ bre/3{holdings_ xml,acn, acp,mra, cbs}&format= mods32
Is this a bug or user error?