Just encountered an example from Jocelyn Lewis, Cataloging Supervisor at ISL where an 856 with two z subfields displays neither field. Removal of one of the two results in display of the other. According to standards the $z is repeatable.
This is on 2.7.2.
Just encountered an example from Jocelyn Lewis, Cataloging Supervisor at ISL where an 856 with two z subfields displays neither field. Removal of one of the two results in display of the other. According to standards the $z is repeatable.
This is on 2.7.2.