Comment 26 for bug 1315552

Thanks, Dan. It's very helpful to have that explained plainly. And Kathy, thanks for weighing in on the intent of the functionality point.

If the order labeled "idealized future" was the original intent, and Dan Scott may be able to illuminate this according to git, then a naive fix is to provide a copy-oriented view of the holdings. Proceeding under that assumption, I'm honestly still not sure if the age of the actual behavior turns this ticket into a bug or a feature request.

I'd like to hear more opinions.

Thanks again, both!