Comment 11 for bug 1257915
Revision history for this message
| Leslie St. John (lstjohn-deactivatedaccount) wrote Re: [Bug 1257915] Re: Acq: purchase orders stay "on-order" with some lineitems received and the rest canceled | #11 |
OK it worked to cancel the line item. The po is still does not reflect
that, nor does the line item until you click on the copies link. But we got
the first bit. YEAH & thanks.
Leslie St. John
*PINES Services Specialist*
Georgia Public Library Service
1800 Century Place, Suite 150
Atlanta, GA 30345-4304
404-235-7129 tel
404.235.7201 fax
www.georgialibr
www.gapines.org
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 5:23 PM, Leslie St. John <
<email address hidden>> wrote:
> on test, po 844. Created list placed order received 3 of the 4 items. 4th
> I can't cancel - i get Event: 10102:ACQ_
> in a cancelable state.
> lineitem 37900
> so I can't do the test!
> Leslie
>
> Leslie St. John
> *PINES Services Specialist*
> Georgia Public Library Service
> 1800 Century Place, Suite 150
> Atlanta, GA 30345-4304
> 404-235-7129 <(404)%20235-7129> tel
> 404.235.7201 <(404)%20235-7201> fax
> www.georgialibr
> www.gapines.org
>
> On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Chris Sharp <email address hidden>
> wrote:
>
>> Working branch here: http://
>> ils.org/
>> r/csharp/
>>
>> I have tested by un-receiving an already received lineitem on a PO with
>> canceled items, then re-receiving the lineitem's copies. The PO should
>> then be marked "received".
>>
>> What I haven't yet tested is what happens when you cancel an item that
>> is the only un-received/
>>
>> --
>> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
>> report.
>> https:/
>>
>> Title:
>> Acq: purchase orders stay "on-order" with some lineitems received and
>> the rest canceled
>>
>> Status in Evergreen:
>> Confirmed
>>
>> Bug description:
>> Seen both in Evergreen master and 2.3.4, purchase orders can get
>> "stuck" in the "on-order" state even when all the lineitems belonging
>> to it have a more final status.
>>
>> It's simple enough to reproduce.
>>
>> - Create a purchase order with, say, 3 lineitems and 2 copies on each
>> of these.
>> - Receive the first two lineitems outright.
>> - Receive one of the copies on the last lineitem and cancel the other.
>>
>> You'll see the PO's own state is still "on-order" when "received"
>> would make more sense.
>>
>> I'm pretty sure "received" would make more sense even in cases where
>> you had a 100 item PO with 1 item received and 99 canceled.
>>
>> Does anybody have a case to make for the current behavior or for a
>> third way?
>>
>> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>> https:/
>>
>
>