Comment 2 for bug 1208967

Became aware of this issue today when a library staff member passed on a question from a patron who was confused about whether the book was still out or not.

I think the renewals should certainly be grouped with the original circulation. As far as the patron is concerned, it's one transaction. If they're using their circ history to keep track of titles they have read, extra rows for the same title just clutters things up in addition to being confusing.

Certainly the column label "DATE RETURNED" is just wrong when the transaction was a renewal.

Ideally, I think the renewals should be grouped with the original checkout, but at the very least the DATE RETURNED column label should be changed.