Comment 14 for bug 1198465

Revision history for this message
Dan Wells (dbw2) wrote :

Concerning again the settings suggestion, I'm happy to drop that. I saw it as an opportunity to have fewer settings with the same net effect, since there is some sensitivity in the community of the over-settingization of Evergreen, but it would really be a false improvement, since the code support itself would be largely unchanged. Also, if we suspect more settings might be added, the mental model argument has a lot of weight.