> I just have one question before merging it. I don't know if this was one
> of the intended use cases, but I used a merge profile that added the 590
> tag as a way to preserve the local note. When importing a record via
> Z39.50 or merging records, I noticed the 590 tag was placed at the top
> of the record rather than among the other 5xx tags. Is there a way it
> could be placed in a more logical location in the record?
Yes, but I think that should be the topic of a separate bug or
enhancement report, as this is an issue with the Vandelay field-level
merge profiles in general.
> I just have one question before merging it. I don't know if this was one
> of the intended use cases, but I used a merge profile that added the 590
> tag as a way to preserve the local note. When importing a record via
> Z39.50 or merging records, I noticed the 590 tag was placed at the top
> of the record rather than among the other 5xx tags. Is there a way it
> could be placed in a more logical location in the record?
Yes, but I think that should be the topic of a separate bug or
enhancement report, as this is an issue with the Vandelay field-level
merge profiles in general.