Comment 4 for bug 1102739

For me, I think maybe what we should try here is to disentangle the series information (with the full statements and details) vs. the actual search series links, which we may only want to include titles for. Perhaps either putting the rest of the series statements in with record details further above in the record summary, or just starting a new series area but make them plain text, not links. Followed by then links just to series titles, and for this we spend more time focusing on how we get those to display. If there's an 800t, go for it, but only show me the 490 if ind1=0 or similar, so that we avoid repetitive links. A sort of hierarchy of what's considered most important as it were?

Putting a tentative target for 2.next because this would be nice to solve during the 2.7 development cycle. Looking for further feedback / opinions by end users.