Comment 14 for bug 1086458
Revision history for this message
| Tim Spindler (tspindler-cwmars) wrote | #14 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
Dan, I should explain how Dan Pearl was testing. He was doing this on his development server and not in our production environment to see if one version of xulrunner was more intensive than another. I think we can pull together more details and data from our member libraries but we have a number of libraries with very active circulation desks that are having the client crash as frequently as every 60-90 minutes or the memory usage is exceeding 2 GB in that time. This, of course, is anecdotal and we can work on getting specifics.