Just my answers to bshum's questions:
- should we have a better description of the org unit setting included in the schema change / upgrade bits?
Probably. Simply repeating the label is not necessarily a good idea.
- should we drop the leading "Vandelay: " from the setting's name as repetitive, given that the group for Vandelay is being used?
Yes.
- are there any other settings that might need moving into the new Vandelay group?
Maybe, but that should be the subject of another LP bug.
Just my answers to bshum's questions:
- should we have a better description of the org unit setting included in the schema change / upgrade bits?
Probably. Simply repeating the label is not necessarily a good idea.
- should we drop the leading "Vandelay: " from the setting's name as repetitive, given that the group for Vandelay is being used?
Yes.
- are there any other settings that might need moving into the new Vandelay group?
Maybe, but that should be the subject of another LP bug.