Comment 4 for bug 1065091

Revision history for this message
Jason Stephenson (jstephenson) wrote :

Chris,

I think the situation is slightly more complicated than just checking the deposit boolean on the copy. That might work for you, but several of our members use the deposit_amount column without the deposit being on. This latter configuration creates a non-refundable fee charged for the copy, such as $1.00 for a DVD.

Either another field (in addition to deposit) should be added to the matrices to handle this case, or the logic of a new field would need additional states. It could be that this limit would just trigger if deposit_amount were filled in, rather than having the deposit field checked. However, there might be cases where someone would want to differentiate between the two types of fee.

I am not opposed to your request prima facie. I just want to explore the options so that we come up with the best solution for everyone.

Thank you,
Jason