Comment 6 for bug 1048822

I've updated the commit for this issue with a slightly different strategy.

Exclude the subfield b, include all of the n and p subfields in the same order they appear in the 245.

With our data this results in an increase in the number of titles over 60 characters by 302 out of 240,000 records.

The performance seems to be pretty close to the original. When viewing all records with 290K bib records the default takes 14-16 seconds and the new version takes maybe a second longer. The planning time takes a few ms longer.

I end up using reporter.super_simple_record for all sorts of other reports that are sent to staff, so fully identifying a specific copy will help for all of those reports.

Josh