On Mar 31, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Andrew Johnson wrote:
> I think msi.c should stay as it is, since we can't guarantee which
> version of Base it will be built against. The original msi.c is safe if
> built against the modified version of Base, but the reverse would not be
> the case.
On Mar 31, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Andrew Johnson wrote:
> I think msi.c should stay as it is, since we can't guarantee which
> version of Base it will be built against. The original msi.c is safe if
> built against the modified version of Base, but the reverse would not be
> the case.
Good point.
--
Eric Norum
<email address hidden>