> Maybe it would be better to use uclibc instead of musl?
This is unfortunately not feasible here, when using base container images themselves built on top of a linux distro that uses musl.
> The alternative would be to require musl users to add a line like
> OP_SYS_CPPFLAGS += -D__MUSL__
> to their configure/os/CONFIG_SITE.Common.linux-x86_64 file before building and to use that as another input to the macros in os/posix/osdExecinfoBackTrace.cpp.
This would be entirely acceptable (provided it is documented)!
Thanks for the quick feedback!
> Maybe it would be better to use uclibc instead of musl?
This is unfortunately not feasible here, when using base container images themselves built on top of a linux distro that uses musl.
> The alternative would be to require musl users to add a line like os/CONFIG_ SITE.Common. linux-x86_ 64 file before building and to use that as another input to the macros in os/posix/ osdExecinfoBack Trace.cpp.
> OP_SYS_CPPFLAGS += -D__MUSL__
> to their configure/
This would be entirely acceptable (provided it is documented)!