I may be quite wrong, but won't that potentially open up another bug, where
if a transition fails or stalls due to computer power, you will not be able
to do anything else?
As said I am likely wrong :)
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Samuel Buffet <email address hidden>wrote:
> When we press the *back* key to quickly, we start another change of
> screen without reaching the end of the first one (=> we do not remove
> the previous screen's Actors from the stage)
>
> I've done a fix which freeze key events as long as screens transitions
> are not finished.
>
> --
> Impatience is bad -- clutter leaving ghosts?
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224700
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
I may be quite wrong, but won't that potentially open up another bug, where
if a transition fails or stalls due to computer power, you will not be able
to do anything else?
As said I am likely wrong :)
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Samuel Buffet <email address hidden>wrote:
> When we press the *back* key to quickly, we start another change of /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 224700
> screen without reaching the end of the first one (=> we do not remove
> the previous screen's Actors from the stage)
>
> I've done a fix which freeze key events as long as screens transitions
> are not finished.
>
> --
> Impatience is bad -- clutter leaving ghosts?
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>