(In reply to comment #3)
> Matthias, I am sorry, but I don't understand why you close this as 'NOTABUG'.
>
> So what you are essentially saying by doing this is that end users should not
> expect dconf to work after they did 'su -', and for what it's worth, I would
> find that assertion questionable. In other words, this ought to be fixed
> somehow, IMHO.
I closed it as NOTABUG because dconf is behaving as expected.
(In reply to comment #3)
> Matthias, I am sorry, but I don't understand why you close this as 'NOTABUG'.
>
> So what you are essentially saying by doing this is that end users should not
> expect dconf to work after they did 'su -', and for what it's worth, I would
> find that assertion questionable. In other words, this ought to be fixed
> somehow, IMHO.
I closed it as NOTABUG because dconf is behaving as expected.