When the program qemu-img with the options of -f raw is used it has some very strange consequences.
Steps to reproduce:
1. mkdir testdir
2. cd testdir
3. qemu-img create -f raw test.img 20G (Other sizes also work)
4. Program starts writing the file and becomes un-killable
5. Open a new terminal in the same directory
6. ls -lah shows that the size of the data in the folder increases up to the point specified in qemu-img, however test.img retains a size of zero. This is why I'm referring to it as a "black hole" If that data isn't getting written to the file, where is it going?
The last time I did this (forgetting about the side effect), I believe it ended up corrupting many of my existing files in my home directory and possibly elsewhere. After doing this I was no longer able to use my wireless connection (or even manage anything with Network Manager - everything was greyed out) and the Suspend/Power Off menu in Gnome Shell disappeared. I'm sure more damage was done, I have just yet to find it. I ended up having to re-install to fix everything (especially to use my wireless connection).
What's odd about this is that qemu-img takes under a second to create a 20G file. My analysis of this coming from a programming background is that the program opens a file handle, moves the filepos to 20,000,000,000 and then closes the file - effectively making it a 20GB file. But, for some reason eCryptfs doesn't play nicely with this file operation. When used in another filesystem (ext* or vfat are the ones I've tried) there are no problems whatsoever. However, if you even attempt to move these files into the eCryptfs it exibits the same aforementioned behavior.
I don't believe this to be the fault of Qemu (though I'm still attempting to look through the code to see exactly how it does the operation) because I've never had any problems with it unless it was used with eCryptfs.
I don't know what I should put up for diagnostics, nor do I have anything left due to the reformat and reinstall. But, if I can provide any information, I will gladly attempt to re-create the situation (albeit in a virtual machine so that I trash my installation again).
As I'm not sure if this overwrote system files or not, I'm not going to flag it as a security vulnerability - though it very well may be.
When the program qemu-img with the options of -f raw is used it has some very strange consequences.
Steps to reproduce:
1. mkdir testdir
2. cd testdir
3. qemu-img create -f raw test.img 20G (Other sizes also work)
4. Program starts writing the file and becomes un-killable
5. Open a new terminal in the same directory
6. ls -lah shows that the size of the data in the folder increases up to the point specified in qemu-img, however test.img retains a size of zero. This is why I'm referring to it as a "black hole" If that data isn't getting written to the file, where is it going?
The last time I did this (forgetting about the side effect), I believe it ended up corrupting many of my existing files in my home directory and possibly elsewhere. After doing this I was no longer able to use my wireless connection (or even manage anything with Network Manager - everything was greyed out) and the Suspend/Power Off menu in Gnome Shell disappeared. I'm sure more damage was done, I have just yet to find it. I ended up having to re-install to fix everything (especially to use my wireless connection).
What's odd about this is that qemu-img takes under a second to create a 20G file. My analysis of this coming from a programming background is that the program opens a file handle, moves the filepos to 20,000,000,000 and then closes the file - effectively making it a 20GB file. But, for some reason eCryptfs doesn't play nicely with this file operation. When used in another filesystem (ext* or vfat are the ones I've tried) there are no problems whatsoever. However, if you even attempt to move these files into the eCryptfs it exibits the same aforementioned behavior.
I don't believe this to be the fault of Qemu (though I'm still attempting to look through the code to see exactly how it does the operation) because I've never had any problems with it unless it was used with eCryptfs.
I don't know what I should put up for diagnostics, nor do I have anything left due to the reformat and reinstall. But, if I can provide any information, I will gladly attempt to re-create the situation (albeit in a virtual machine so that I trash my installation again).
As I'm not sure if this overwrote system files or not, I'm not going to flag it as a security vulnerability - though it very well may be.