1. file a bug
2. wait 1-2 years
3. bug gets marked as invalid
4. if you are lucky it was fixed upstream and is fixed in a future release
the use of the system seems designed to disuade people from using launchpad.
Rather than the point of "report all bugs" it is the point of "being insulted for reporting any bug".
And this is a serious bug - ubuntu is corrupt users files if they use an offered feature.
Mint is where it is at; while ubuntu is "debian done nicely" - mint seems to be: "ubuntu with the bugs fixed"
I'm still on ubuntu but I'm not expecting to stay, I've had enough of being insulted by launchpad scripts.
How did get launchpad get to be so rubbish?
The typical ubuntu scenario is like like this:
1. file a bug
2. wait 1-2 years
3. bug gets marked as invalid
4. if you are lucky it was fixed upstream and is fixed in a future release
the use of the system seems designed to disuade people from using launchpad.
Rather than the point of "report all bugs" it is the point of "being insulted for reporting any bug".
And this is a serious bug - ubuntu is corrupt users files if they use an offered feature.
Mint is where it is at; while ubuntu is "debian done nicely" - mint seems to be: "ubuntu with the bugs fixed"
I'm still on ubuntu but I'm not expecting to stay, I've had enough of being insulted by launchpad scripts.