Had this happen to me a year ago -- my mistake was failing to test the
restore immediately after the initial backup. I'm using grsync at this
point, a not-great but at least adequate substitute.
On 07/24/2013 12:53 AM, Frederic Dreier wrote:
> I added a try/catch around the faulty lines (like the one in the patch)
> and get it going through the restore. just missing sevral files (logs,
> gnome config DB, etc.).
>
> I just got a bad feeling about it since my backup is my 'last ressort'
> when something goes wrong (here a HD crash). I expect it to be bullet-
> proof.
>
> I hope duplicity will fix it since it is still a sooo great software for
> backup.
>
> Regards
>
Had this happen to me a year ago -- my mistake was failing to test the
restore immediately after the initial backup. I'm using grsync at this
point, a not-great but at least adequate substitute.
On 07/24/2013 12:53 AM, Frederic Dreier wrote:
> I added a try/catch around the faulty lines (like the one in the patch)
> and get it going through the restore. just missing sevral files (logs,
> gnome config DB, etc.).
>
> I just got a bad feeling about it since my backup is my 'last ressort'
> when something goes wrong (here a HD crash). I expect it to be bullet-
> proof.
>
> I hope duplicity will fix it since it is still a sooo great software for
> backup.
>
> Regards
>