Comment 4 for bug 1236248

Revision history for this message
edso (ed.so) wrote :

1. thx

2. using file-to-restore might take another code path but that's just a wild guess.

generally duplicity should be able to at least restore _everything_ from the volumes alone. signatures should only be needed for incrementals and list-current-files listing.
i bet duplicity could theoretically even restore single files but would have to bandwidth-inefficiently download all volumes until it finds the entry.

..ede