On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:13:31AM -0000, BJ Dierkes wrote:
> Future thinking: It would be a good idea to have a file that lists the
> plugins that are considered stable/production quality. For packaging
> this makes it clear that a plugin is more-or-less safe to add to a
> distribution set.
>
> Suggested:
>
> drizzle-XXXX.XX.XX/plugin/STABLE
>
>
> A flat file that lists plugin names that are stable. With the number of plugins it will be difficult for a package maintainer to keep up on discussion lists and what not to know where a plugin is in its development cycle.
We could also have this in the plugin.ini and have a configure option
or something....
On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 12:13:31AM -0000, BJ Dierkes wrote: XXXX.XX. XX/plugin/ STABLE
> Future thinking: It would be a good idea to have a file that lists the
> plugins that are considered stable/production quality. For packaging
> this makes it clear that a plugin is more-or-less safe to add to a
> distribution set.
>
> Suggested:
>
> drizzle-
>
>
> A flat file that lists plugin names that are stable. With the number of plugins it will be difficult for a package maintainer to keep up on discussion lists and what not to know where a plugin is in its development cycle.
We could also have this in the plugin.ini and have a configure option
or something....
--
Stewart Smith