Yep, absolutely correct. I will work on this one. Slowly, RAW_SQL statements are being removed (and replaced with more specific message subclasses that better describe the statement) but in the meantime, it would be a pretty trivial fix to add in the schema name into the message.
Yep, absolutely correct. I will work on this one. Slowly, RAW_SQL statements are being removed (and replaced with more specific message subclasses that better describe the statement) but in the meantime, it would be a pretty trivial fix to add in the schema name into the message.
Cheers!
Jay