Comment 8 for bug 1698652

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Monty Taylor <email address hidden> wrote:
> It does indeed.
>
> Luke, terribly sorry for any unintentional offense given, that was
> certainly not our intent back in 2009, nor do I imagine it's anyone's
> intent today.

 none taken.

> HOWEVER
>
> As the note higher in the file indicates, the source was taken from the
> pyjamas repo. While the file did not (and still does not) include a
> copyright license itself, the repo in which it is located does include
> an Apache v2 license in its COPYING file:

 yeah 2017-2009= err... 8 years: it's too long ago for me to remember
details. i have never been a fan of permissive licenses: however
pyjamas was a project i inherited and so there was not a lot of choice
*sigh*.

> I'm putting this back to invalid. Whether it was your intent at the
> time, you offered this code to the world under the terms of the COPYING
> file in the pyjamas repo back in 2009.

agreed.

well at least this exercise has prompted me to take an interest in the
code again. i notice there's some modifications made: also i tested
it out on lintian (in debian) which is a single wildcard "*" and
there's clearly something amiss: not one of the matches is correct.

i'll check this out and get back to you (separate bugreport).

l.