Well, I'd agree it should be fixed in the JDK (see previous link to blog post) but in the meantime it's fixable and would be much appreciated. Point me to the "startup" class or main frame or whatever in the source and I'll try to provide you with a a patch.
Well, I'd agree it should be fixed in the JDK (see previous link to blog post) but in the meantime it's fixable and would be much appreciated. Point me to the "startup" class or main frame or whatever in the source and I'll try to provide you with a a patch.