Comment 12 for bug 395991

Developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers developers. Without these needed architectural changes, this developer, who writes Docky, will go insane. Just like that guy who throws chairs and yells about developers. Don't get me wrong, I love you for being one of my users but let me set something straight. I make decisions for Docky to make it the best damn dock out there. Do I think Do integration makes Docky awesome? Damn skippy I do. Do I think I can make something even MORE awesome? You betchya (calling Mrs. Palin). Wait until I get Docky-2 out with a "feature complete" release and judge me then. You may come to the conclusion that the Do integration was actually holding it back. I know it will be hard to have blind faith, but I built Docky 1, I can build Docky-2!

Before you make any more comments, this does NOT mean:
- Docky will get more complicated to use
- Docky will be gaining a huge number of options (all options gained I hope to make possible to configure without a traditional configuration UI)
- Docky will have an overbearing configuration dialog (hate thouse)
- Docky will suck

This may however imply:
- Docky may get buddy buddy with some other upcoming technologies.
- Docky may be entered into a cloning machine
- Docky may be able to manage things you never thought possible
- Docky may become aware of things in magical ways that will always be magically awesome