On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:00 PM Heather Ellsworth
<email address hidden> wrote:
>
> I agree that the uicheck-sw test has increased in flakiness. How about
> instead of removing the test or sinking the resources into actually
> fixing them right now, I can mark them flaky so that at least a failed
> test looks like a skipped test:
Would work for me, can we mark flaky-on-armhf only (I'd not be aware)?
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 9:00 PM Heather Ellsworth
<email address hidden> wrote:
>
> I agree that the uicheck-sw test has increased in flakiness. How about
> instead of removing the test or sinking the resources into actually
> fixing them right now, I can mark them flaky so that at least a failed
> test looks like a skipped test:
Would work for me, can we mark flaky-on-armhf only (I'd not be aware)?