Instead of "database_name_prefix", how about "database_name_format", so "prefix_%s_suffix" ?
Also, I'm wary of changing the name, if it's ever possible the far end will inject the new database name into our replication upstream somewhere.
Instead of "database_ name_prefix" , how about "database_ name_format" , so "prefix_%s_suffix" ?
Also, I'm wary of changing the name, if it's ever possible the far end will inject the new database name into our replication upstream somewhere.