Comment 4 for bug 174481
Revision history for this message
| brewster (brewster) wrote Re: [Bug 174481] Re: tune parameters to pdf_comp -recode | #4 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
bbfa235
(Get the code!)
the cinder4q... on preview is much more readable than the cinder.pdf, in
my opinion.
which is the direction of the future?
-brewster
MarcusLucero wrote:
> Looked at all 4 pdf's posted at
> http://
>
> Microsoft Windows XP Professional Version 2002:
>
> Adobe Reader 8
> FoxIT Reader 2.2
> SumatraPDF-0.7
> cutePDF
> eXPertPDF 2.0.50
>
> you get the picture...
>