Comment 4 for bug 979500

Oh right! The behaviour makes sense now.

Yes, your suggestion works — I found it described somewhere else and used it right after this approach failed.

So this isn't so much a bug, but a data point suggesting ambiguous wording...? Now that I read it again, I have to admit I don't know how else I'd phrase that action, but at the time it seemed like the obvious way to do what I wanted.

I'll leave it to you to decide whether I'm a standard case in usability, or an outlier :P