Comment 42 for bug 385495

Revision history for this message
Kenneth Loafman (kenneth-loafman) wrote : Re: [Bug 385495] Re: Large backup signature and manifest files should be split with --volsize too

There is progress on this and the need is greater now that the new librsync
has come out.

It will come out in the 0.8 series along with full support for the new
librsync hash. With the new hash the table size will double, thus doubling
the need for a solution to this issue. That's going to cause the need for
full backups on transition to 0.8. We'll still be able to read 0.7 and
below, but not write them.

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Remy van Elst <email address hidden>
wrote:

> Is there any progress on this issue? Would throwing money at the problem
> work? It is a dealbreaker for some of my backups...
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to
> Duplicity.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385495
>
> Title:
> Large backup signature and manifest files should be split with
> --volsize too
>
> Status in Duplicity - Bandwidth Efficient Encrypted Backup:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> With new 0.6.0 release, the signature & manifest archive should be
> split to respect the volume size's command line option.
>
> Without this, it's not possible to backup to limited filesize backend,
> like imap, or ftp.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/385495/+subscriptions
>