Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:07:23 +0100
From: Norbert Tretkowski <email address hidden>
To: Helge Kreutzmann <email address hidden>,
<email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#289560: Woody still vulnerable (or at least no entry in non-vulns-list)
severity 289560 minor
severity 291125 minor
thanks
* Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> At least woody is not fixed. I just checked, there is also no entry in
> http://www.debian.org/security/nonvulns-woody
> for this issue. Either one (the first preferably) needs to be handled.
No DSA, statement from security team was: "problem is not in active
code".
I'll try to prepare an update and upload it to woody-proposed-updates
so it gets into 3.0r5.
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:07:23 +0100
From: Norbert Tretkowski <email address hidden>
To: Helge Kreutzmann <email address hidden>,
<email address hidden>, <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#289560: Woody still vulnerable (or at least no entry in non-vulns-list)
severity 289560 minor
severity 291125 minor
thanks
* Helge Kreutzmann wrote: www.debian. org/security/ nonvulns- woody
> At least woody is not fixed. I just checked, there is also no entry in
> http://
> for this issue. Either one (the first preferably) needs to be handled.
No DSA, statement from security team was: "problem is not in active
code".
I'll try to prepare an update and upload it to woody-proposed- updates
so it gets into 3.0r5.
Norbert