On 28 July 2014 14:35, Phillip Susi <email address hidden> wrote:
> I was going to say that adding an option would break the ABI wouldn't
> it? And it sounds like you are saying that it did, and so the disk
> utility now is completely broken. If so, then yes, this certainly does
> need reverted; we can't be changing the ABI.
>
No ABI is broken, nor changed. Please read & understand the patch I
uploaded, before making false statements. If you have questions, ask
and I'll explain more what it does.
disk utility can't format drives in Ubuntu. The patch I added to
UDisks2 has no effect on disks utility in either way, since simply the
default (broken) behavior is used there.
On 28 July 2014 14:35, Phillip Susi <email address hidden> wrote:
> I was going to say that adding an option would break the ABI wouldn't
> it? And it sounds like you are saying that it did, and so the disk
> utility now is completely broken. If so, then yes, this certainly does
> need reverted; we can't be changing the ABI.
>
No ABI is broken, nor changed. Please read & understand the patch I
uploaded, before making false statements. If you have questions, ask
and I'll explain more what it does.
disk utility can't format drives in Ubuntu. The patch I added to
UDisks2 has no effect on disks utility in either way, since simply the
default (broken) behavior is used there.
--
Regards,
Dimitri.