Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:49:03 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Frank_K=FCster?= <email address hidden>
To: Martin Schulze <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, Debian Security Team <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in
embedded xpdf copy
Hi Joey,
Martin Schulze <email address hidden> wrote:
> The original patch was not sufficient. I'm attaching the entire and the
> incremental patch. Please apply the incremental patch to the version in
> sid as well.
Did you see Martin Pitt's "enhanced" patch - do both address the same
problems?
TIA, Frank
P.S. Did you see my mail to -release regarding the tetex-base upload to
stable/proposed-updates?
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
Message-ID: <email address hidden> 1?q?Frank_ K=FCster? = <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 18:49:03 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-
To: Martin Schulze <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>, Debian Security Team <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#342292: tetex-bin: Multiple exploitable heap overflows in
embedded xpdf copy
Hi Joey,
Martin Schulze <email address hidden> wrote:
> The original patch was not sufficient. I'm attaching the entire and the
> incremental patch. Please apply the incremental patch to the version in
> sid as well.
Did you see Martin Pitt's "enhanced" patch - do both address the same
problems?
TIA, Frank
P.S. Did you see my mail to -release regarding the tetex-base upload to proposed- updates?
stable/
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer