Comment 48 for bug 26650

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 12:42:45 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <email address hidden>
To: Martin Pitt <email address hidden>
Cc: Frank =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=FCster?= <email address hidden>,
  <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#342292: Fwd: Re: [vendor-sec] xpdf update - patch wrong?

* Martin Pitt:

> Hi Florian!
>
> Florian Weimer [2005-12-09 11:53 +0100]:
>> * Martin Pitt:
>>
>> > - For invalid (big) positive values of nObjs which, when multiplied with nObjs
>> > overflow an int, we have two cases:
>>
>> But neither ISO C nor GNU C make any promises regarding this case.
>> Overflow is undefined, period.
>
> Ah, right, I mixed that up with additive overflow (which is defined).

I think you mean unsigned arithmetic, which is performed module 2^k
for some k.