* Martin Pitt:
> - For invalid (big) positive values of nObjs which, when multiplied with nObjs > overflow an int, we have two cases:
But neither ISO C nor GNU C make any promises regarding this case. Overflow is undefined, period.
You can pass -fwrapv to gcc if you want modulo arithmetic for ints. In general, this decreases code quality, that's why it's not the default.
* Martin Pitt:
> - For invalid (big) positive values of nObjs which, when multiplied with nObjs
> overflow an int, we have two cases:
But neither ISO C nor GNU C make any promises regarding this case.
Overflow is undefined, period.
You can pass -fwrapv to gcc if you want modulo arithmetic for ints.
In general, this decreases code quality, that's why it's not the
default.