Thank you, this sounds like a net improvement to me!
I've cross-linked the Debian bug report above.
Here are the passing autopkgtests: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-xypron-gnu-efi/mantic/amd64/s/securefs/20230508_111311_b5145@/log.gz https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-xypron-gnu-efi/mantic/arm64/s/securefs/20230508_112303_44029@/log.gz https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-mantic-xypron-gnu-efi/mantic/ppc64el/s/securefs/20230508_110950_67081@/log.gz
Sponsored: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/securefs/0.13.1+ds-1ubuntu1
Thank you, this sounds like a net improvement to me!
I've cross-linked the Debian bug report above.
Here are the passing autopkgtests: /autopkgtest. ubuntu. com/results/ autopkgtest- mantic- xypron- gnu-efi/ mantic/ amd64/s/ securefs/ 20230508_ 111311_ b5145@/ log.gz /autopkgtest. ubuntu. com/results/ autopkgtest- mantic- xypron- gnu-efi/ mantic/ arm64/s/ securefs/ 20230508_ 112303_ 44029@/ log.gz /autopkgtest. ubuntu. com/results/ autopkgtest- mantic- xypron- gnu-efi/ mantic/ ppc64el/ s/securefs/ 20230508_ 110950_ 67081@/ log.gz
https:/
https:/
https:/
Sponsored: https:/ /launchpad. net/ubuntu/ +source/ securefs/ 0.13.1+ ds-1ubuntu1