On 2016-12-06 03:37, Nathanaël Naeri wrote:
> Regarding the pepperflashplugin-nonfree package in the Ubuntu
> archive, I am in favor of proposing to drop it from the archive in
> zesty (I believe you mean zesty).
Yes. Thanks for pointing it out.
> BTW, was there ever a consensus in favor or against enabling partner
> at install time, when you contacted the ubuntu-devel list?
No. Because of my mistake in the first message, there was a side discussion, but nobody commented on the actual proposal. I think I'll ask Chris Coulson (who currently maintains both adobe-flashplugin and flashplugin-installer) in a private mail. Will ask for his view on pepperflashplugin-nonfree as well, to confirm that our assumption, that adobe-flashplugin will keep being maintained, is correct.
On 2016-12-06 03:37, Nathanaël Naeri wrote: in-nonfree package in the Ubuntu
> Regarding the pepperflashplug
> archive, I am in favor of proposing to drop it from the archive in
> zesty (I believe you mean zesty).
Yes. Thanks for pointing it out.
> BTW, was there ever a consensus in favor or against enabling partner
> at install time, when you contacted the ubuntu-devel list?
No. Because of my mistake in the first message, there was a side discussion, but nobody commented on the actual proposal. I think I'll ask Chris Coulson (who currently maintains both adobe-flashplugin and flashplugin- installer) in a private mail. Will ask for his view on pepperflashplug in-nonfree as well, to confirm that our assumption, that adobe-flashplugin will keep being maintained, is correct.