On snein 15 Maart 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> It's fine with me if the bug is closed. My only point in reporting what
> I did is there is a Debian patch to bin/update at
> <http://patch-tracking.debian.net/patch/series/view/mailman/1:2.1.11-11/67_
>update_handle_old_versions.patch> which is still being applied, at least to
> Mailman 2.1.11.
>
> I have committed a change to Pending.py on the 2.2 branch which
> conflicts with 67_update_handle_old_versions.patch, and I wanted you to
> know this.
Excellent, it is now well documented and the bug is not listed as affecting
our current version, so that's exactly where we want to be :-)
On snein 15 Maart 2009, Mark Sapiro wrote: patch-tracking. debian. net/patch/ series/ view/mailman/ 1:2.1.11- 11/67_ handle_ old_versions. patch> which is still being applied, at least to handle_ old_versions. patch, and I wanted you to
> It's fine with me if the bug is closed. My only point in reporting what
> I did is there is a Debian patch to bin/update at
> <http://
>update_
> Mailman 2.1.11.
>
> I have committed a change to Pending.py on the 2.2 branch which
> conflicts with 67_update_
> know this.
Excellent, it is now well documented and the bug is not listed as affecting
our current version, so that's exactly where we want to be :-)
Thijs