Comment 21 for bug 1848330

Hi, all.

I obtained feedback from one Canonical customer (with a Support Case opened just for that), that hit the very same bug and, when testing the package sitting in -proposed, didn't reproduce the issue anymore.

From his own words:

"I wasn't able to recreate the auditd problem with the updated auditd package from proposed. Once we have the release package we can test that in the production environment."

Thanks!