On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 03:25:25PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:19:00PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > Bug#211765, "xfree86: material under non-free licenses in XFree86"
> > appears to have been languishing for a few months now, without anyone
> > trying to talk to the copyright holders to see if this stuff can be
> > relicensed in a DFSG-free fashion.
> It's worth noting this bug was tagged "help" about 3 days after it was
> filed. Thanks for contributing to my call for assistance.
> > So, is there anyone here with the time and energy to look into this iss=
ue,
> > and ideally others?
> I think someone willing to tackle this one would be ideal enough for the
> time being, as it doesn't just affect XFree86. Mesa uses much of the
> same code.
> Particularly valuable in this particular case would probably be someone
> who is a known quantity to SGI.
I'm aware of one developer who is currently an SGI employee; I'll check
with him to see what approach he recommends.
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:38:45 -0600
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Cc: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Request for someone to talk to copyright holders
--RNGrj7vazCqBHNw7 Disposition: inline Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-
Content-
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 03:25:25PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:19:00PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > Bug#211765, "xfree86: material under non-free licenses in XFree86"
> > appears to have been languishing for a few months now, without anyone
> > trying to talk to the copyright holders to see if this stuff can be
> > relicensed in a DFSG-free fashion.
> It's worth noting this bug was tagged "help" about 3 days after it was
> filed. Thanks for contributing to my call for assistance.
> > So, is there anyone here with the time and energy to look into this iss=
ue,
> > and ideally others?
> I think someone willing to tackle this one would be ideal enough for the
> time being, as it doesn't just affect XFree86. Mesa uses much of the
> same code.
> Particularly valuable in this particular case would probably be someone
> who is a known quantity to SGI.
I'm aware of one developer who is currently an SGI employee; I'll check
with him to see what approach he recommends.
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--RNGrj7vazCqBHNw7 pgp-signature Disposition: inline
Content-Type: application/
Content-
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
/xFVKN6ufymYLlo RAs5EAJ0bCVPdcI 6eQS85GkI0YIkBl POlTgCfbZ8z aVJbTtGg=
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/
5sH982226YPyaOG
=tscV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--RNGrj7vazCqBH Nw7--