Am 29.10.2012 18:09, schrieb Yaroslav Halchenko:
> Hi Andreas! Thanks a bunch -- now splitting behavior seems to be much
> better, i.e. I am not getting unexpected splits whenever I do not want
> anything changed while I am just sending a buffer for execution.
>
> The only catch I found: if there is 2 (or more) views of the same
> buffer from which I am sending code for execution -- then the active one
> would flip into some other different (not visible before) buffer upon
> sending (e.g. via C-c C-c)
>
Am 29.10.2012 18:09, schrieb Yaroslav Halchenko:
> Hi Andreas! Thanks a bunch -- now splitting behavior seems to be much
> better, i.e. I am not getting unexpected splits whenever I do not want
> anything changed while I am just sending a buffer for execution.
>
> The only catch I found: if there is 2 (or more) views of the same
> buffer from which I am sending code for execution -- then the active one
> would flip into some other different (not visible before) buffer upon
> sending (e.g. via C-c C-c)
>
thanks, it here now: lp:1072816