dateutil

  1. Bug #1300508
  2. Comment #1

Comment 1 for bug 1300508

Revision history for this message
Paul G (p-ganssle) wrote :

This bug was also reported on the github issue tracker: https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/issues/25

I submitted a PR some time ago to at least partially deal with this by adding a "smart parser" option, which attempts to make a more reasonable choice of default dates if unspecified. Comments on the approach would be appreciated: https://github.com/dateutil/dateutil/pull/30