Comment 12 for bug 68158

I apologize if anything I wrote was disrespectful. The bug was closed
and I was trying to argue forcefully that it be reopened. In the company
where I work discussions about whether a bug should be fixed or not are
appropriately recorded in the bug db. I was not aware that was not
normal practice for Ubuntu. I will not do so again.

Douglas

On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 22:29 +0000, Bruce Cowan wrote:
> May I remind you of the Code of Conduct -
> http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct, specifically the "Be
> respectful" part.
>
> Arguements such as this should be kept to the forums, not bug reports.
>
> Nothing is forcing you to use Ubuntu, if you don't like the fact that
> LTS doesn't mean new software, then don't use it.
>
> Of course if you really wanted this, you could build firefox 2.0
> yourself with a different package name (firefox2). The only person who
> has the obigation to fix a "bug" is yourself -
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/page.cgi?id=etiquette.html
>
> Following on from what Martin said, I notice that Breezy now has the 1.5
> branch of Firefox, but that was for security reasons.
>
> To be honest, Firefox 2.0 isn't much upon 1.5 anyway.
>