Machine count for Ubuntu version includes machines known to be running newer version
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Daisy |
Confirmed
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Suppose we get error reports from a machine running Ubuntu version N.
Later, we get error reports from the same machine running Ubuntu version N+1, N+2, or whatever.
Provided that we don't get further reports from it running Ubuntu version N (indicating a dual boot), it's safe to assume that it doesn't have N installed any more.
However, we don't remove it from the count of machines running N until 90 days has passed without a report. It would be more accurate to remove it from the count immediately.
Hypothesis: If we fix this, the October-to-January dip in <https:/
Similarly, the post-April plummet in <https:/
description: | updated |
summary: |
- Machine counts for Ubuntu version include machines known to be running + Machine count for Ubuntu version includes machines known to be running newer version |
"Provided that we don't get further reports from it running Ubuntu version N"
How long do we wait? If we have a system in the list of systems seen in the past 90 days for Quantal and Raring, do we check to see if there were any crashes for that system in Quantal just for yesterday (we always work on the previous day)?
Or do we say that if said machine shows and Quantal crashes over the next week, we'll go back and repair the counts to include it in both the Quantal and Raring lists?