(In reply to comment #54)
> Are the patches fixing pdftocairo the same way as pdftops so that the PS
> output of pdftocairo has everything fixed which was fixed in pdftops?
>
> See the following bug report
>
> https://bugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1176
>
> The rporter tells that all is OK when using pdftops and he gets a wrong
> result with pdftocairo.
He also filed bug 73452 a few minutes ago. I assumed CUPS should be setting the page size when IncludeFeature is used as described in:
(In reply to comment #54) /bugs.linuxfoun dation. org/show_ bug.cgi? id=1176
> Are the patches fixing pdftocairo the same way as pdftops so that the PS
> output of pdftocairo has everything fixed which was fixed in pdftops?
>
> See the following bug report
>
> https:/
>
> The rporter tells that all is OK when using pdftops and he gets a wrong
> result with pdftocairo.
He also filed bug 73452 a few minutes ago. I assumed CUPS should be setting the page size when IncludeFeature is used as described in:
http:// lists.cairograp hics.org/ archives/ cairo/2006- February/ 006278. html
but this does not seem to work. Looks like I will need to use setpagedevice in the cairo PS output.