On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 19:37 +0000, Jeffrey Baker wrote:
> I think you nailed it, James. With your patch, c-k-d uses a steady
> amount of CPU over time (about 2% with a high login load). It's still
> leaking memory slowly, but I now assume that's a separate bug.
Thanks for testing, glad to know that it seems to help.
I would appreciate testing by someone else, as I was unable to reproduce
the problem in the first place, and I'm not totally sure that the patch
is correct. Would someone else be able to test the package?
On Sun, 2008-11-23 at 19:37 +0000, Jeffrey Baker wrote:
> I think you nailed it, James. With your patch, c-k-d uses a steady
> amount of CPU over time (about 2% with a high login load). It's still
> leaking memory slowly, but I now assume that's a separate bug.
Thanks for testing, glad to know that it seems to help.
I would appreciate testing by someone else, as I was unable to reproduce
the problem in the first place, and I'm not totally sure that the patch
is correct. Would someone else be able to test the package?
Thanks,
James