Historically speaking, yes, 0.9+ was a continuation of the original project. This was agreed upon by the main stakeholders at the time in 2009. Of course, the reality is different - some people want to keep using the 0.8 series. That's their choice.
To make things work practically - can the binaries by renamed in the fedora packagespec, or do they need to be renamed upstream?
Historically speaking, yes, 0.9+ was a continuation of the original project. This was agreed upon by the main stakeholders at the time in 2009. Of course, the reality is different - some people want to keep using the 0.8 series. That's their choice.
To make things work practically - can the binaries by renamed in the fedora packagespec, or do they need to be renamed upstream?