> What I'm trying to say is that it would be very easy (in theory) to make
> a shadow plugin that doesn't have any of the drawbacks of the current
> decor shadowing. And the code could potentially be quite small.
>
Yes, I agree entirely, it would be very simple. But it will count as a new
"feature" so we can't do it like that :)
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012, Daniel van Vugt wrote:
> What I'm trying to say is that it would be very easy (in theory) to make
> a shadow plugin that doesn't have any of the drawbacks of the current
> decor shadowing. And the code could potentially be quite small.
>
Yes, I agree entirely, it would be very simple. But it will count as a new
"feature" so we can't do it like that :)
> -- /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 931883 slow_movement /bugs.launchpad .net/compiz- core/+bug/ 931883/ +subscriptions
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Compiz
> Maintainers, which is the registrant for Compiz Core.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> Improve performace of the shadow clipping code
>
> Status in Compiz Core:
> Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
> This branch is a starter lp:~smspillaz/compiz-core/compiz-
> core.fix_
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/
>