common-lisp

  1. Bug #1084644
  2. Comment #7

Comment 7 for bug 1084644

Revision history for this message
Robert P. Goldman (rpgoldman) wrote :

I would NOT like to see this happen. My company's lisp development relies on us maintaining our own libraries. We think that quicklisp is a great thing for many purposes, but do not want to see reliance on it baked into lisp implementations.